W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [dpub-loc] Use Cases

From: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:38:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ-O9Tt4nGne7KZ=t4Lp5-D7WQg=Bf9DODxH+jgy5aTsgYR0UA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Cc: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Hi Leonard,

As agreed on the call, we will consolidate all use case discussion on the
github repo (https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr). I will make new issues
there per use case type, and add your comments and my answers :).

Thanks!
Kind regards,
Ben

Ben De Meester
Researcher Semantic Web
Ghent University - iMinds - Data Science Lab | Faculty of Engineering and
Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems
Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
t: +32 9 331 49 59 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL:
http://users.ugent.be/~bjdmeest/

2016-02-03 16:55 GMT+01:00 Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>:

> I have to disagree with your creating a new flavor – cached.  Caching is a
> feature of an RS and NOT part of a file format, such as PWP.
>
> However, if you simply replace all instances of cached with local or
> downloaded, then so far so good for annotating across states.
>
> The concept of public and private annotations is out of scope and has
> nothing to do with PWP.
>
> Leonard
>
> From: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
> Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 1:56 PM
> To: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <
> public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> Subject: [dpub-loc] Use Cases
> Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 1:57 PM
>
> Hi all,
>
> Below, you can find some use cases I thought of, where I think the
> locators should be resilient to.
> Something to discuss at 3PM UTC :)
>
> state-wise, I currently assume the following:
> * a PWP can be unpacked or packed
> * a PWP can be online (http), offline (cache), or downloaded (file). Other
> variations like accessing via FTP etc. are not excluded.
>
> ## Annotating across states
>
> *1 Writer Annie has her book published on her own web space as a PWP
> [http/unpacked]. Reader Bob reads it online, and selects a nice quote to
> bookmark via its browser PWP bookmarking plugin: PWPMark-plugin.
> *2 Writer Annie has her book published on her own web space as a PWP
> [http/unpacked]. Reader Bob caches the PWP [cache/unpacked], reads it
> offline, and selects a nice quote to bookmark using PWPMark-plugin.
>   *2a When Bob re-opens the offline PWP, the booksmarks are shown via
> PWPMark-plugin
>   *2b When Bob re-visits the original PWP, PWPMark-plugin can also show
> Bob's bookmarks in the online version.
> *3 Writer Annie has her book published on her own web space as a PWP
> [http/packed]. Reader Bob opens it online using the PWP reading plugin
> PWPRead-plugin, and selects a nice quote to bookmark via PWPMark-plugin.
> *4 Writer Annie has her book published on her own web space as a PWP
> [http/packed]. Reader Bob caches it using a plugin [cache/packed], and
> selects a nice quote to bookmark via PWPMark-plugin.
> *5 Writer Annie has her book published on her own web space as a PWP, both
> packed [http/packed] as unpacked [http/unpacked]. Reader Bob reads
> [http/unpacked] online and selects a nice quote to bookmark via
> PWPMark-plugin. Then, Bob downloads [http/packed] to his local filesystem
> [file/packed] to open in his reading system of choice, namely, PWPRead-soft.
>   *5a PWPRead-soft synchronizes with Bob's PWPMark profile, and can show
> Bob's bookmarks when he continues reading [file/packed]
>
> ## Private/Public annotations
>
> *1 Bob is reading in PWPRead-soft, and makes private annotations. These
> annotations can be - via Bob's PWPMark profile - synced across devices.
> *2 Bob makes a couple of his annotations public. Chris also has a PWPMark
> profile, and choses to show all public annotations whilst reading using
> PWPRead-plugin. Chris sees Bob's annotations whilst reading the same
> document.
>   *2a this could be extended to more 'fine-grained' user access, e.g., two
> lawyers annotating the same contract as a PWP on their own computer. These
> annotations are shared only in specific groups, depending on what the
> PWPMark software allows.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben
> Ben De Meester
> Researcher Semantic Web
> Ghent University - iMinds - Data Science Lab | Faculty of Engineering and
> Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems
> Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
> t: +32 9 331 49 59 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL:
> http://users.ugent.be/~bjdmeest/
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2016 07:39:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:40 UTC