W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [i18n-discuss] The HTML q element can sometimes be useful. Discuss.

From: johnwcowan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:54:53 +0000
To: public-digipub-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-215847730-1461956092-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
So what we have here is a case where dialogue invented by the author 
(of a non-fiction book) gets quotation marks, and actual quotations 
from the sources that are not merely quoted but are reasserted by the 
author (that is, if they are false, he is making a false claim) are 
put in a different font (not merely bold italic, as shown here; see 
the Google Books view).  Which, if either, should be marked up with q 
elements?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by johnwcowan
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-discuss/issues/1#issuecomment-215847730 
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 18:54:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:42 UTC