- From: Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:39:03 +0200
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, www International <www-international@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Den 2016-04-21 18:29, skrev "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>: > As long as you are adding minority opinions, why not add mine, which has > seen some support on this list? > > "Others believe that even if the behavior of the q element were to be > fully standardized, no single set of conventions can meet all needs, > and that therefore the q element should be avoided in favor of explicit > quotation marks, unless semantic analysis needs to determine which > parts of the text are quotations. In this case, each q element should > be associated with a class which bears an explicit CSS quote property." I agree with John's comment. /Kent Karlsson
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 18:39:38 UTC