- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:06:06 -0500
- To: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>
- Cc: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Hi Michiel. I agree with what you say here: On 11/11/2015 08:54 AM, Michiel Bijl wrote: > I agree that generated content can be useful. Take css counters for > example, you can only visualise these through pseudo-elements. Wouldn’t > it be better to get the bugs fixed than to forbid meaningful content in > pseudo-elements? I realise that this is easier said than done. And I wasn't suggesting we forbid meaningful content in pseudo-elements; merely discourage it until the bugs get fixed. Speaking of which, a list of key bugs we need fixed can be found here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Nov/0094.html. See also, for instance, all the bugs listed as dups of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12460 -- a bug filed in 1999 btw. Suggestions regarding what we can do to get them fixed so that generated content can be: 1. Selected, copied, pasted, etc. 2. Searched for. 3. More easily and reliably exposed -- and exposed completely -- to ATs ?? --joanie
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:08:12 UTC