RE: Call for comments from IG: STEM survey first draft

Hi Peter,

Excellent work.

I recommend linking to the Web Annotations WG instead of the DPUB TF

Because some of these questions will be irrelevant to some respondents, I recommend making all questions optional.

Question 4: target audience. Is there a way we can make this multiple choice? Perhaps:
K12 students
University Students
Graduate Students
Researchers
Professionals
Other

Question 7: I think the wording might be a little confusing because we are asking both whether existing tech is sufficient and insufficient at once. Perhaps, break it into 2 parts. (What) do you use to associate additional with your content (multiple choice). Then free-form, do you find this sufficient, please explain.

Question 9: I am not sure that this question will be clear enough. Perhaps, we need to clarify what we mean by re-usable. Re-usable to whom? I think this is targeting the publishers in the audience and the question is whether the publishers are re-using content chunks.

Question 15: Massive collaboration is listed twice

Question 17: Do you want respondents to specify which tools are in use? Perhaps clarify what you’d like to see in comments.

Question 29: I am not sure what you mean by non-web. Is this offline? Print?

Thanks,
Tzviya
****************************
Tzviya Siegman * Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead * John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
111 River Street, MS 5-02 * Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 * 201-748-6884 * tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Peter Krautzberger [mailto:peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:55 PM
To: W3C Digital Publishing IG
Subject: Call for comments from IG: STEM survey first draft

Hi everyone,

I've finished the first draft of the STEM TF Survey.

You can find it at  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/64149/DPUB-STEM-2014-12/.


Please take a look and post comments here.

Best,
Peter.