Re: Removing the focus on EPUB...

>  “Portable Documents for OWP Content"

"Portable Open Web" sounds awesome to me.

Peter.

PS: And we get a meme for free:
http://batman60stv.wikia.com/wiki/File:Pow.jpg

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
wrote:

> As was discussed on the other (public) mailing list, there is agreement in
> the community that the method of packaging the OWP assets is not relevant
> to the larger set of discussions on requirements or even the actual goal of
> this IG.   In fact, the document at http://w3c.github.io/epubweb/ is
> itself quite clear about that in the initial NOTE where it says that name
> “EPUB+WEB” is just a placeholder. HOWEVER, the document which should (IMO)
> be looking at the entire landscape of solutions to the problem of “Portable
> Documents for OWP Content”, immediately picks a solution without any
> consideration to possible alternatives.
>
> I would like to suggest that the document be edited to remove all
> references to a specific technology – including the “codename” - and
> instead focusing on addressing the larger problem.  And, yes, I am willing
> to do that work with the committee’s blessing.
>
> Leonard
>
>