W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > June 2014

Re: W3C specifications important for the DPUB industry.

From: Livio Mondini <l.mondini@webprofession.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA2uxmtkjVxj2B8W=Bd7J3HMSiWG5LthT5oOO7ZCKsKKccLp5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
And javascript?

Livio


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 08:21 , Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > Romain,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your input.
> > I have added your spec suggestion to the table.
> >
> > Note that I linked to the latest draft publish in TR (instead of trhe
> editor's draft on github) when there was a TR draft.
>
> I wonder whether it is not worth doing both. In many WG-s the formal
> publications on /TR are relatively scarce, meaning that the editor's draft
> is significantly ahead of the latest official publication. User,
> implementers, etc, are usually better off looking at the editor's draft (I
> know it is the case in another WG where I am staff contact). Having a
> reference to the latest stable edition as well as the editor's draft might
> be of interest.
>
> Of course, there are cases when this may be unnecessary, namely when the
> document status is CR or 'higher', ie, when the design phase is already
> done.
>
> Ivan
>
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Thierry.
> >
> >
> > On 24/06/2014 10:08, Romain Deltour wrote:
> >> I’m not a member of the DPUB IG but since you’re calling for a larger
> review here are a few comments:
> >>
> >>   Almost all the specs from the Web Application WG are relevant IMO (if
> not for current EPUB 3.x, at least for the future of digital publishing).
> To name a few:
> >>
> >>    - Manifest for web applications (WD) http://w3c.github.io/manifest/
> >>    - Service Workers (WD)
> http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/
> >>    - Custom Elements (WD)
> http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/
> >>    - HTML Imports (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/imports/
> >>    - Shadow DOM (D) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/
> >>
> >>   The table can also include Jeni Tennison’s TAG draft on packaging:
> >>
> >>    - Packaging on the Web (ED)
> http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/
> >>
> >>   The specs from the IndieUI WG may be more relevant to reading
> systems, but are important to adaptability and a11y:
> >>
> >>    - User Context 1.0 (ED)
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndieUI/raw-file/default/src/indie-ui-context.html
> >>    - Events 1.0 (WD) http://www.w3.org/TR/indie-ui-events/
> >>
> >>   Note also that ARIA 1.1 is not in the table (ARIA 1.0 is), although
> it’s already referenced by EPUB 3.0.1 (notably for its aria-describedat
> attribute).
> >>
> >>
> >> Hope this helps,
> >> Romain.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Romain Deltour, Software Developer
> >> The DAISY Consortium
> >> http://www.daisy.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24 juin 2014, at 08:33, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> A few months ago I had started an initial list of W3C specifications
> that are important for the Digital Publishing industry [1], as it is
> required in our interest Group Charter deliverables [1].
> >>>
> >>> Thanks to them, a few participants of the DPUB IG have edited and
> update this table.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to request a review from a larger group of participants,
> to enrich this list with W3C technologies that you may be aware of and are
> missing in this table.
> >>>
> >>> Then we will have to  prioritized this list, according to our charter..
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your collaboration,
> >>>
> >>> Thierry Michel.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB
> >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/digpubig.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 01/04/2014 15:13, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Per my action item, I have started a list of W3C specifications that
> are
> >>>> important for the Digital Publishing industry.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB
> >>>>
> >>>> this is only a start, therefore  feel free to add/update this table
> with
> >>>> new specs.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you have any issues regarding this task, let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thierry.
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 11:42:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:20 UTC