Re: [Moderator Action] Re: W3C specifications important for the DPUB industry.

I think the MathML-for-CSS-profile should be removed from the list. The
MathWG strongly discourages the use of it.

IIRC it was only ever meant to justify the (poor) MathML support present in
Opera/presto (pre Blink); the profile also relies on the CSS3 Tables Module
which has since been retired (it was only ever implemented in Opera/presto)

If it helps, I can get some comment from MathWG members.

Peter.


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> (forwarding for archival)
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: W3C specifications important for the
> DPUB industry.
> > Date: 24 Jun 2014 10:09:23 GMT+2
> > To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <
> public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> >
> > I’m not a member of the DPUB IG but since you’re calling for a larger
> review here are a few comments:
> >
> >  Almost all the specs from the Web Application WG are relevant IMO (if
> not for current EPUB 3.x, at least for the future of digital publishing).
> To name a few:
> >
> >   - Manifest for web applications (WD) http://w3c.github.io/manifest/
> >   - Service Workers (WD)
> http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/
> >   - Custom Elements (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/
> >   - HTML Imports (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/imports/
> >   - Shadow DOM (D) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/
> >
> >  The table can also include Jeni Tennison’s TAG draft on packaging:
> >
> >   - Packaging on the Web (ED)
> http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/
> >
> >  The specs from the IndieUI WG may be more relevant to reading systems,
> but are important to adaptability and a11y:
> >
> >   - User Context 1.0 (ED)
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndieUI/raw-file/default/src/indie-ui-context.html
> >   - Events 1.0 (WD) http://www.w3.org/TR/indie-ui-events/
> >
> >  Note also that ARIA 1.1 is not in the table (ARIA 1.0 is), although
> it’s already referenced by EPUB 3.0.1 (notably for its aria-describedat
> attribute).
> >
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Romain.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Romain Deltour, Software Developer
> > The DAISY Consortium
> > http://www.daisy.org
> >
> >
> >
> > On 24 juin 2014, at 08:33, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> A few months ago I had started an initial list of W3C specifications
> that are important for the Digital Publishing industry [1], as it is
> required in our interest Group Charter deliverables [1].
> >>
> >> Thanks to them, a few participants of the DPUB IG have edited and
> update this table.
> >>
> >> I would like to request a review from a larger group of participants,
> to enrich this list with W3C technologies that you may be aware of and are
> missing in this table.
> >>
> >> Then we will have to  prioritized this list, according to our charter.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your collaboration,
> >>
> >> Thierry Michel.
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB
> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/digpubig.html
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/04/2014 15:13, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Per my action item, I have started a list of W3C specifications that
> are
> >>> important for the Digital Publishing industry.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB
> >>>
> >>> this is only a start, therefore  feel free to add/update this table
> with
> >>> new specs.
> >>>
> >>> If you have any issues regarding this task, let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Thierry.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>
>
>
>
>
>