# Re: The AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:58:02 +0800
Cc: Jean Kaplansky <Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Gerardo Capiel <gerardoc@benetech.org>, Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, W3C Public Digital Publishing IG Mailing List <public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org>
To: "Cramer, Dave" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>
As an admin chime in:-): I fully agree with Dave! Both on keeping the line an also by introducing somethings like [...].

(This is the good type of problem: that means the list is active:-)

Ivan

On Nov 7, 2013, at 03:23 , "Cramer, Dave" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com> wrote:

> On 11/6/13 10:39 AM, "Jean Kaplansky" <Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Digital Publishing Interest Group -
>>
>> Are these on-the-go math conversations something you want to see continue on this list, or should we take this off line and then come back to the group with use cases?
>>
>> I ask because I think we can keep the conversation about MathML, MathJax, and Accessibility going in great detail, but I certainly don’t want to hijack the W3 DPUB threads for this purpose if we should take the conversation off line.
>
> I'm in favor of everything staying on the mailing list, as it's more transparent, and even though some of us may not contribute much to a particular subject, we may want to keep up with the discussion.
>
> I think the CSS Working Group's approach could work, using [subject lines] to allow users to filter discussions. We can have [pagination], [mathml], etc.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> Dave
>>
>
> This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.

----
Ivan Herman, W3C