W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2017

Re: F2F at TPAC 2017 this year?

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:07:10 +0000
To: "Lukasz Olejnik (W3C)" <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
CC: "tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com" <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>, "W3C Device APIs WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <90478677-495F-4CA9-A057-12C66C627205@intel.com>
> On 11 May 2017, at 11:47, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 2017-05-08 1:08 GMT+02:00 Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>:
> 
> 
> > > One of the reasons for a F2F is to  see if we can have implementers in the SF area to attend and have a working session, as well as encouraging wider W3C member participation in our work. We also should think about which joint meetings would be useful - suggestions?  (Privacy and Security interest groups are two).
> > >
> > > Please note thoughts or concerns on the list before 1 May. Earlier is better.
> >
> > I think a F2F also this year at TPAC would be time well spent. In
> > particular, the close proximity to the Bay Area companies means we might
> > be able to attract new participants and implementers to the meeting. I
> > expect the various sensor deliverables [1] to be the main topic of
> > discussion.
> >
> > The recurring theme around sensors seems to be privacy and security, so a
> > joint meeting with the domain experts in that field sounds like a good
> > idea.
> 
> I'm highly supportive of this idea.
> 
> Would be an interesting idea, although people versed in the topic are pretty much on both continents ;-)

[[

Please note that we have decided not to have a WG meeting at TPAC 2017.

We are considering a workshop in Europe along with an associated WG meeting instead. 

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2017May/0004.html

]]

Thanks,

-Anssi
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 09:07:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:10 UTC