W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2016

Re: [sensors] Does SensorReading always need a timeStamp ?

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 13:28:49 +0000
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-217863823-1462800528-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
timestamps are the only way to compute both latency and frequency, so 
it seems like they're super useful.

What's the overhead of providing those? I imagine they're provided by 
the underlying platforms anyway, no?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/105#issuecomment-217863823 using
 your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 13:28:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:08 UTC