W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Update on privacy work

From: Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:05:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC1M5qo_s743mYBTGUPb8+EnCdbmmGvANgB5azgGhHqekKJtug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
Cc: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hello,

Please see my answers below.

2016-06-06 5:43 GMT+01:00 Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>:

> Lukasz
>
> Thanks for the update, makes sense
>
> see inline for additional
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> > On May 28, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks for pinging me.
> > I am going through a very... eventful time recently. I keep my eyes open
> on the lists and works.
> >
> > First of all, if I understand correctly, privacy considerations for
> Vibration are accepted. I'm unsure if we should include a detailed
> discussion about cross-device, cross-domain and others. Perhaps this should
> be included in the sensors that can actually read/interpret data (vibration
> "writes").
> > It is also closed in GH.
> >
> > For the generic sensors API, I listed [1] and [2] as possible issues
> that might need to be addressed ("upstream").
> >
> > For Ambient Light Sensors, I am waiting for a message indication that
> the considerations in Vibration API are fine. Then I go to ALS. Yes, indeed
> I would use my report as a blueprint. But I am thinking of something more,
> too. We discussed some privacy aspects at [3].
> >
> > Is there any "delivery" date I should keep in mind for ALS?
>
> what is status of PING comments?
>

I'm unsure, weren't you (or rather, Nick Doty) supposed to write down a
note on this a while ago?
For the moment, the considerations section seem sound, albeit general, but
hopefully address [1].
Are we still waiting for [2]


>
> >
> > I'm also wondering if there may be some other outside-the-box issues, so
> I asked Riju if it's possible to test the initial implementation (thanks,
> Riju!). Now I need to close my current tasks outside of W3C and proceed to
> this as well.
> >
> >
> > As for the PDF report, I am also wondering if we could lead this to a
> W3C Note. Personally, I think this would be an interesting work.
> > In this case, I am volunteering to be an editor. I would ask for a
> co-editor (from DAS and/or PING)?
>
> Perhaps you can start with creating an additional note using a ReSpec
> template (perhaps Dom has pointer to latest)
>

Sounds good, although I'm not versed in this ;-)
Do you think I would need a co-editor?
Initial vision and final aims should be highlighted in the beginning, of
course.

>
> > In this case, we should also come up with recommendations for web
> authors?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this
>

Would it be a proper place to include recommendations to Web designers?
Something similar to 'Web Accessibility guidelines [3].

[1]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2016Feb/0072.html
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2016AprJun/0014.html
[3] https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2016 11:05:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:08 UTC