W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > July 2016

Re: Update on privacy work

From: Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:06:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC1M5qp7BTDSrqworzaF1_g+ZQRS=sQUh+SZ8i7RXmZ9C=TU_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>, W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Thanks a lot,

And I apologize I do not take part in PING's teleconferences, for similar
reasons.

Best
Lukasz

2016-07-15 15:09 GMT+01:00 Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>:

> Hello Lukasz,
>
> Thanks for the pointer to the updates to the privacy and security
> considerations for the Vibration API.
>
> I’ll refer these to PING and make sure this is on the agenda for the next
> call (28 July UTC 16).
>
> Christine
>
> > On 24 Jun 2016, at 12:09 PM, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Let's also see if the recent (
> https://w3c.github.io/vibration/#security-and-privacy-considerations)
> updates to the considerations are in line.
> > If I understand correctly, (hopefully) they are?
> >
> > Best
> > Lukasz
> >
> > 2016-06-23 19:55 GMT+01:00 Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>:
> > I believe Nick  and/or Christine were to document PING privacy
> considerations to share with DAS (for Vibration, Ambient Light, general etc)
> >
> > Perhaps this has already been done - Christine/Nick, what is the status
> of PING comments to DAS?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > regards Frederick
> >
> > Frederick Hirsch
> > Chair, Devices and Sensors WG
> >
> > > On Jun 11, 2016, at 7:05 AM, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <
> lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Please see my answers below.
> > >
> > > 2016-06-06 5:43 GMT+01:00 Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>:
> > > Lukasz
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update, makes sense
> > >
> > > see inline for additional
> > >
> > > regards, Frederick
> > >
> > > > On May 28, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <
> lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for pinging me.
> > > > I am going through a very... eventful time recently. I keep my eyes
> open on the lists and works.
> > > >
> > > > First of all, if I understand correctly, privacy considerations for
> Vibration are accepted. I'm unsure if we should include a detailed
> discussion about cross-device, cross-domain and others. Perhaps this should
> be included in the sensors that can actually read/interpret data (vibration
> "writes").
> > > > It is also closed in GH.
> > > >
> > > > For the generic sensors API, I listed [1] and [2] as possible issues
> that might need to be addressed ("upstream").
> > > >
> > > > For Ambient Light Sensors, I am waiting for a message indication
> that the considerations in Vibration API are fine. Then I go to ALS. Yes,
> indeed I would use my report as a blueprint. But I am thinking of something
> more, too. We discussed some privacy aspects at [3].
> > > >
> > > > Is there any "delivery" date I should keep in mind for ALS?
> > >
> > > what is status of PING comments?
> > >
> > > I'm unsure, weren't you (or rather, Nick Doty) supposed to write down
> a note on this a while ago?
> > > For the moment, the considerations section seem sound, albeit general,
> but hopefully address [1].
> > > Are we still waiting for [2]
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm also wondering if there may be some other outside-the-box
> issues, so I asked Riju if it's possible to test the initial implementation
> (thanks, Riju!). Now I need to close my current tasks outside of W3C and
> proceed to this as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As for the PDF report, I am also wondering if we could lead this to
> a W3C Note. Personally, I think this would be an interesting work.
> > > > In this case, I am volunteering to be an editor. I would ask for a
> co-editor (from DAS and/or PING)?
> > >
> > > Perhaps you can start with creating an additional note using a ReSpec
> template (perhaps Dom has pointer to latest)
> > >
> > > Sounds good, although I'm not versed in this ;-)
> > > Do you think I would need a co-editor?
> > > Initial vision and final aims should be highlighted in the beginning,
> of course.
> > >
> > > > In this case, we should also come up with recommendations for web
> authors?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean by this
> > >
> > > Would it be a proper place to include recommendations to Web designers?
> > > Something similar to 'Web Accessibility guidelines [3].
> > >
> > > [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2016Feb/0072.html
> > > [2]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2016AprJun/0014.html
> > > [3] https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 15:06:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:08 UTC