- From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:51:30 +0000
- To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Yeah, I guess my main question was whether this needed to be formal (in the sense of saying something silly like: "compliant extension specifications must do X"), or keep it informal (and thus non-normative) but use rfc2119 words anyway (for example, specs SHOULD expose low level sensors, spec MUST define a corresponding SensorReading subclass, etc.). -- GitHub Notification of comment by tobie Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/84#issuecomment-177910358 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 1 February 2016 10:51:32 UTC