Re: [sensors] No way to express an abstract constructor in WebIDL from Tobie Langel via GitHub on 2015-05-18 (public-device-apis@w3.org from May 2015)

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:35:44 +0000
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-103164588-1431974143-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Thanks for the clarification, @domenic. I was wrongly assuming there 
were some correspondance between the names of the Constructor's 
arguments and the attributes of the interface object, but it turns out
 this doesn't seem to be the case and needs to be specified in prose. 
WebIDL is hard.

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by tobie
See https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/19#issuecomment-103164588

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 18:35:45 UTC