W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > June 2015

Re: [sensors] SensorIdentifier is bizarre

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:27:57 +0000
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-110064779-1433780876-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
TBH, this is mostly a placeholder to be able to think about things 
more clearly.

> First, URL is not appropriate here: 


> Second, why would you use a Symbol?

Someone suggested it in #26. Anything that identifies the actual 
physical sensor was what I was after.

> Third, why is this an "or"? Is the idea here that implementations 
are allowed to be inconsistent---some of them returning URL objects, 
some of them Symbols, and some of them USVStrings? Or even a random 

No. The idea was just that remote sensors as described in WoT use URLs
 as identifiers, analog sensors use pin numbers (in Johnny-Five), and 
something is needed to identify onboard sensors too. See the two 
issues in the spec about this.

GitHub Notif of comment by tobie
See https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/30#issuecomment-110064779
Received on Monday, 8 June 2015 16:27:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:05 UTC