- From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:50:31 -0500
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
This is great news - thanks to the Firefox team and to you for the follow-up Anssi! I look forward to seeing the results from Zhiqiang and then moving forward. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Chair, W3C Device APIs WG (DAP) www.fjhirsch.com @fjhirsch > On Nov 25, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Zhiqiang, > > As of Firefox 43 [1], the Battery Status API uses the new promise syntax, as specified in the latest Battery Status API specification [2]. > > Could you run the test suite [3] with Firefox (Nightly) and report back any issues you may find and generate a test results page with both Chrome and Firefox results and link it to [4] with notes on passes/failures. > > Frederick - if we see green across two implementations, I believe we could start look at moving the spec to PR. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/43#Miscellaneous > [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/battery/Overview.html > [3] http://w3c-test.org/battery-status/ > [4] https://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 12:51:09 UTC