W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > April 2015

Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:30:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78hAGg4M1Mw7c-2HVSzt+qzAvMo2Mj5FSwfLY35A1eCsYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
Cc: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Device APIs Working Group <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "slightlyoff@chromium.org" <slightlyoff@chromium.org>, "yasskin@gmail.com" <yasskin@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote:
> I think it's OK for different browsers to experiment with different non-interoperable conditions under which they fulfill or reject the permissions promise. That's already true for most permissions grants today.

It's true when UX is involved. When UX must not be involved, it's a
very different situation. For those cases we do spell out what needs
to happen.

Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 14:30:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:05 UTC