W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Standby API Specification Proposal

From: Marcos <marcos@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:14:54 -0400
To: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Mats Wichmann <m.wichmann@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <etPan.53834c5e.6b8b4567.3f3@Marcoss-MacBook-Pro.local>


On May 23, 2014 at 11:59:22 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux (dom@w3.org) wrote:
> >
> Based on a subsequent thread in the brand new specifiction forum  
> [1], I
> have drafted a very rough proposal that would fulfill the use  
> cases that
> have been discussed:
> http://w3c.github.io/screen-wake/navigator_poke.html  
> (see also
> https://github.com/w3c/screen-wake)
>  
> It is pretty different from the similar APIs in this space:
> https://github.com/w3c-webmob/web-api-gap/blob/master/features/screen-wake.md  
> (which means it's probably not the easiest path to convince implementors)  
>  
> Dom
>  
> 1.
> http://discourse.specifiction.org/t/allow-developers-to-control-wake-lock-aka-disable-auto-dimming/  

Following Dom's lead, I've put together an alternative proposal: 
https://github.com/w3c/screen-wake/blob/gh-pages/screen_requestWakeLock.md

It be great if other could do the same, then we can debate the merits of each. 
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 14:15:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:03 UTC