Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status)

Thanks Zhang!


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
wrote:

> > From: Zhang, Zhiqiang [mailto:zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 5:30 PM
> > > From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:w3c@fjhirsch.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:06 PM
> > > For vibration I notice there is one 'fail' for Firefox. What do we
> have to do
> > to
> > > address this 'fail' - is there an action on someone? I assume once
> this fail is
> > > addressed then we are done testing Vibration, have two implementations
> > > and could progress toward Recommendation.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031226 reported for
> Firefox
> > for Android.
>
> This issue is fixed and verified on Firefox for Android Nightly. So we've
> gotten all tests pass on both Chrome 35 and Firefox 33. Please check the
> update test results at
>
> https://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus
>
> Revisiting @darobin's TODO list at
>
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/vibration/TODO.txt
>
> ... we still miss tests for
>
>     - do nothing when hidden
>     - cancel when dynamically hidden
>     - reinstate when dynamically shown
>
Reinstatement should not happen: "When the visibilitychange event
[PAGE-VISIBILITY] is dispatched at the Document in a browsing context, the
user agent must cancel the pre-existing instance of the processing
vibration patterns algorithm, if any." It is canceled, not suspended.

Regards,

Michael



>     - invalid values
>
> If you have tests for these checkpoints or want to write some, feel free
> to submit them to
>
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/vibration
>
> Thanks,
> Zhiqiang
>
>