- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:29:29 +0100
- To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
- Cc: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, Dariel Marlow <dmarlow@gmail.com>, "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Giri, On mer., 2014-02-05 at 14:22 +0000, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote: > Idle API is among the Phase 2 items for the SysApps Working Group - > http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/. I think this kind of proposal would > be better discussed in that WG, since an API will be defined for idle > user notification already. I did notice the "Idle API" in http://www.w3.org/2012/09/sysapps-wg-charter.html I agree it might be similar to what Anssi was alluding to, but taken from the reverse perspective. It certainly seems quite different from the prevent-standby proposal though. Dom
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:29:54 UTC