Re: DAP-ISSUE-129: Simplify Network Service Discovery API [Network Service Discovery]

Does the use of promises achieve the needed simplification while also supporting the cases Cathy mentions related to this issue?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jul/0036.html

If so, can we close this issue?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:23 AM, ext Jean-Claude Dufourd wrote:

Le 15/7/13 23:44 , Cathy.Chan@nokia.com<mailto:Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> a écrit :




-----Original Message-----
From: ext Device APIs Working Group Issue Tracker
[mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:17 PM
To: public-device-apis@w3.org<mailto:public-device-apis@w3.org>
Subject: DAP-ISSUE-129: Simplify Network Service Discovery API [Network
Service Discovery]

DAP-ISSUE-129: Simplify Network Service Discovery API [Network Service
Discovery]

http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/129

Raised by: Jean-Claude Dufourd
On product: Network Service Discovery

from email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-
apis/2013Jun/0015.html


The current NSD API is used in this sequence:
- NSD.getNetworkServices( "type", callback, errorcb)
- then in callback, you immediately set the onserviceavailable callback and
you return, because usually, the first NetworkServices object you get is
empty


Re "usually, the first NetworkServices object you get is empty": This depends
on the UA implementation. If the UA continuously monitors network traffic for
device announcement messages, it would always have a list of currently
available devices on hand, and the NetworkServices object returned in the
success callback would contain the matching devices for which the user grants
permission. In this case, an empty NetworkServices object in the success
callback would indicate that there are no matching devices available to the
web app (either no matching devices are available on the network at all, or
the user did not grant permission to any available ones). On the other hand,
if a UA does not continuously monitor network traffic for device announcement
messages, and only issues a search when the getNetworkServices method is
called, then the NetworkServices object returned in the success callback would
most likely be empty, regardless of what devices are available on the network.

I think this discrepancy in the meaning of an empty NetworkServices object
might affect interoperability and is worth taking a closer look at.



- then onserviceavailable is called, and in there you call
NSD.getNetworkServices( "type", callback, errorcb) again
- then in callback, you immediately set the onserviceavailable callback and
you do the actual work.

You need to define:
- a function calling NSD.getNetworkServices( "type", successcallback,
errorcb)
- a onserviceavailable callback that calls NSD.getNetworkServices( "type",
successcallback, errorcb)
- the successcallback.

It is possible to define a wrapper around this to deal with the
onserviceavailable process transparently for the author, on top of the
existing API.
Thus, I avoid the need for the definition of onserviceavailable.

The actual code does the same as above, but the process that the webapp
author sees is:
- discover( "type", callback, errorcb)
- then in callback, you immediately do the actual work.



Is "callback" meant to be a one-time callback or to be called many times
potentially?

JCD: "My" version of the callback is definitely called back as often as the initial version (or maybe once less).
But it is simpler, since you do not have to deal with the onserviceavailable mechanism.






Why not simplify the API and get rid of the need for onserviceavaible ?
Why make the API more complex than it needs to be ?
Why expose a more intricate process that brings no advantage ?



I think the two-step process has its value. After supplying the initial batch
of devices to the web app, onserviceavailable continues to notify the web app
if and when new devices become available on the network [if the UA continues
to monitor network traffic for device announcements]. The callback allows the
web app to take control of when to re-invoke getNetworkServices, which would
likely result in user permission prompts. In the model that you're suggesting,
[again, if the UA continues to monitor network traffic for device
announcements,] whenever a matching device shows up in the network, the user
would be prompted if he wants to grant permission to the web app to access the
matching devices. Imagine that your web app is streaming media from a media
server. If the user gets a prompt every time a media server pops up in the
network (which can be more frequent than you think if you consider media
servers running on mobile phones that go online and offline all the time to
preserve power) while watching a movie, that can be very frustrating. On the
other hand, with the model in the current spec, the web app can choose to
defer the call to getNetworkServices (and hence the user permission prompt) to
a more convenient time.

JCD: This would hopefully happen only at the "beginning" of the use of the web app in a network configuration, or when some new device appears.
Afterward, the permissions would have been given once already, and the security checks would not be required.
Unless the user is a security freak and never uses "always allow" on web apps and devices the user uses repeatedly.
Best regards
JC


Regards, Cathy.



Best regards
JC

Note: here is a possible implementation of the wrapper avoiding the need
for onserviceavailable:

function discover(serviceType, callBack, errcb) {

     var thisFunction = function (services) {

         services.onserviceavailable = function () {

             NSD.getNetworkServices(serviceType, thisFunction, errcb);

         };

         if (services.length > 0) {

             callBack.call(this, services);

         }

     };

     NSD.getNetworkServices(serviceType, thisFunction, errcb);

}






--
<logo-tpt.png><http://www.telecom-paristech.fr/>        Jean-Claude DUFOURD<http://jcdufourd.wp.mines-telecom.fr/>
Directeur d'études
Tél. : 01 45 81 77 33   37-39 rue Dareau
75014 Paris, France

<web.png><http://www.telecom-paristech.fr/><twitter.png><https://twitter.com/TelecomPTech><facebook.png><https://www.facebook.com/TelecomParisTech><googleplus.png><https://plus.google.com/111525064771175271294><blog.png><http://blogrecherche.wp.mines-telecom.fr/>

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 13:57:38 UTC