W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Re: Shelving Intents-based specs

From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:06:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAxVY9cOVc2jdGjKLr2guBwSQm=YKe1-k-UCSX9wRp-JgGePfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
Cc: "jsoref@blackberry.com" <jsoref@blackberry.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
I have a TODO to mark the web intents spec as... what should I do? I'm not
sure the correct wording. The idea is "we hope this is useful for further
consideration, so we aren't deleting it, but it's not intended to be
implemented as is."


On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:58 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com> wrote:

>   How difficult is it to bring them back to active development if we get
> some traction e.g. on intents or
> activities? Can we continue to develop them as notes? I would rather not
> move them to notes too fast. As noted in the meeting I think the issues
> with intents and activities UI need more investigation before we pull the
> plug.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan
>
>
>
>
>
> ------ Original message------
>
> *From: *Josh Soref
>
> *Date: *Fri, 4/26/2013 2:29 PM
>
> *To: *Robin Berjon;DAP;
>
> *Subject:*Re: Shelving Intents-based specs
>
>
>   Sadly, I support shelving at this time, until such a time as an Intents
> or similar mechanism appears.
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> From: Robin Berjon
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 1:57 PM
> To: DAP
> Subject: Shelving Intents-based specs
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to suggest that we shelve all the specs we have out there that
> depend on Intents (e.g. Pick Contacts), including parking as Note. The
> reason I ask is that I'm getting reports of people being confused by
> this (notably, it would seem, in SysApps) and while Intents are
> relatively stalled there is no hope of it progressing anyway, so we
> might as well make that clear to people.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
>
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 23:06:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:59 UTC