W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Ambient Light Events: why two events?

From: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:02:24 +0100
Message-ID: <517267B0.4000000@mozilla.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, ext Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
That sounds right.  You agree that we should change the proximity event in the same way as we are doing here, right?

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Doug Turner<dougt@mozilla.com>  wrote:
>> +1 to combining the events.  Keep in mind that we separated the proximity
>> sensor events into one that reports distance and one that reports a text
>> (near, far).  We probably should fix that one too.
>> Should the LightLevelState be optional?  A minor concern is that we do have
>> a number of devices in the field that already support this event without
>> this attribute.
> It seems simpler to just require it and classify the early
> implementations as experimental.
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 10:02:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:58 UTC