W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [media-capture][LC] HTML Media Capture Comments ( LC-2639)

From: <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:00:28 +0000
Message-Id: <E1TBWdI-0004w5-F0@jessica.w3.org>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
 Dear Doug Schepers ,

The Device APIs Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the
Last Call Working Draft [2] of the HTML Media Capture published on 12 Jul
2012. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to
send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-device-apis@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 18 September
2012. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation


For the Device APIs Working Group,
Dave Raggett
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/4FFF382B.70204@w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/


Your comment on 5.1 Attributes capture of type DOMString:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/#attributes
> Why 'camcorder' instead of 'videocamera'? I think 'videocamera' would be
> more intuitive for non-native speakers.

Working Group Resolution (LC-2639):
No change in order to maintain consistency with Android 4.0 browser and
Chrome for Android.

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 20:00:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:55 UTC