W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [sensors] the near/far event names

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:32:07 +0000
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3AB65800-B199-4E0D-B4DE-D6640DA6E3D2@att.com>
Ok, when the user is in front of the laptop at typical distance, the Webapp will enable a video feed. When the user moves away, the Webapp can disable the feed. Similar control can be applied to the mic (audio mediastream).

Bryan Sullivan

On May 14, 2012, at 4:03 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> On 14/05/2012 14:48, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
>> I was echoing the use case pointed out by Dzung, ie the user is using a laptop, and the very close proximity assumptions of a mobile phone don't apply (unless you wanted to use the proximity sensor to know that a laptop has been closed). In the user proximity case the developer may want to know specifically how far the user is, if such is supported by sensors.
> What problem is the developer wanting to solve by knowing the precise distance from the user to the device (i.e., in terms of min, max, value VS near/far)? With all due respect, the above is not a use case. A use case would be something like "If the developer knows that the user is X value away, then the developer can do the following things:". No one has presented "the following things" yet, specially as they relate to "min, max, value" VS "near/far" (apart to working out near/far!).
> So, again, can you tell me what you (Bryan) would do with min, max, value if you had access to it?
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 14:33:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:53 UTC