Re: Device light and proximity sensor

El 09/05/12 19:02, "Doug Turner" <dougt@mozilla.com> escribió:

>Yup.  Suggestions on how to address it?

Forget about events and let's do it through a Sensor API

>
>On May 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Dave Raggett wrote:
>
>> Its a damp grey day here, so I am obliged to worry that if these
>> additional parameters vary from one browser/platform to another, we have
>> created a nice finger print for those nice tracking folks.
>>
>> On 09/05/12 17:24, Doug Turner wrote:
>>> Yup.
>>>
>>> On May 9, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Tran, Dzung D wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doug,
>>>> Your suggestion here is to add them as optional to the callback. So
>>>>are these readonly and constant throughout the events?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Dzung Tran
>>>>
>>>> From: Doug Turner [mailto:dougt@mozilla.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:29 AM
>>>> To: N.V.Balaji
>>>> Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; Niklas Widell; Robin Berjon;
>>>>public-device-apis@w3.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Device light and proximity sensor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 9, 2012, at 8:24 AM, N.V.Balaji wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I feel, addition of sensor_granularity and interval parameters can
>>>>help to solve parts of the problems that you have mentioned. The
>>>>interval parameter is used in device orientation event specification
>>>>([1]) as well. Developers can detect the usefulness of the data based
>>>>on these two parameters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> :)  Yup.  Lets add both of those (as options) to the spec.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>>
>
>
>



Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 17:39:16 UTC