W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2012

RE: Device light and proximity sensor

From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 13:52:47 +0000
To: Niklas Widell <niklas.widell@ericsson.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>, "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
CC: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <84BCA539DD96614691177EDA3CE4FF0546B0B4C6@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hello All,

I think we can have similar solution for all the sensors in the current sensor spec. I have agreed with Doug that I would revise the current spec to what Doug has proposed.

Thanks
Tran

-----Original Message-----
From: Niklas Widell [mailto:niklas.widell@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:08 AM
To: Doug Turner; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Cc: Robin Berjon; public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org
Subject: Re: Device light and proximity sensor

On 2012-05-07 17:58, "Doug Turner" <dougt@mozilla.com> wrote:

>
>On May 7, 2012, at 8:47 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
>
>> I do like the simplicity of the proposals. I would like to see them
>>extended to ambient sound as well, using the same simple model
>
>Yup.  I agree.

Is there anything preventing doing all the sensors in the current [1]
sensor API with similar solutions?

[1] 
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/sensor-api/Overview.html#datatypes
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 13:53:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:30 GMT