- From: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:36:53 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
On Mar 22, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le jeudi 22 mars 2012 à 09:24 -0700, Doug Turner a écrit : >> I am taking a much simpler approach to this whole thing. Here is what >> I am doing for proximity. It follows what we did for device motion: >> https://dougturner.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/device-proximity/ > > It's simpler, but not that much simpler. One reason I took the approach > I mentioned is that some proximity sensors only report a boolean state > (near/far); without a notion of accuracy, I don't know how your proposal > addresses this. yes, but it is simpler and follows a known pattern. > Also, I thought the "activate-on-addEventListener" was considered a bad > practice based on the feedback to DeviceOrientation? there is precedent. we are only sending notifications when there is a change. that was the objection, iirc. Doug
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:37:26 UTC