W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > March 2012

Re: CfC to change Sensor approach, not progress current draft

From: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:24:44 -0700
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-Id: <47FA9EAD-539C-4182-8818-AD89318AD197@mozilla.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>

On Mar 22, 2012, at 2:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:

> Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 17:04 +0800, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:22 , <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
>> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1).
>> 
>> I'd really like to see proposals for sensor APIs there, especially
>> things like Proximity that are common and really useful.
> 
> FWIW, I had sent proposals for Proximity and ambient light a while ago:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0236.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0238.html
> 
> Dom

I am taking a much simpler approach to this whole thing.  Here is what I am doing for proximity.  It follows what we did for device motion:

    https://dougturner.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/device-proximity/

Doug
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:25:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:53 UTC