Re: CfC to change Sensor approach, not progress current draft

On Mar 22, 2012, at 2:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:

> Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 17:04 +0800, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:22 , <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
>> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1).
>> 
>> I'd really like to see proposals for sensor APIs there, especially
>> things like Proximity that are common and really useful.
> 
> FWIW, I had sent proposals for Proximity and ambient light a while ago:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0236.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0238.html
> 
> Dom

I am taking a much simpler approach to this whole thing.  Here is what I am doing for proximity.  It follows what we did for device motion:

    https://dougturner.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/device-proximity/

Doug

Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:25:19 UTC