Re: CfC to change Sensor approach, not progress current draft

El 21/03/12 10:04, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com> escribió:

>On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:22 , <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
><Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
>>positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1).
>
>+1
>
>I'd really like to see proposals for sensor APIs there, especially things
>like Proximity that are common and really useful.

If there are better proposals I would not recommend to bring them to DAP,
they will end up in the /DAP/null

>
>--
>Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
>


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 10:55:22 UTC