W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [vibration] Preliminary thoughts on the vibrator spec

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:35:19 +0200
Message-Id: <6897ABA4-2257-420B-8384-CA81469432D5@nokia.com>
To: "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, ext Justin Lebar <jlebar@mozilla.com>
[ + public-device-apis ]

Hi Justin, All,

On 26.1.2012, at 18.07, ext Justin Lebar wrote:

>> I updated the spec and dropped null. Now we should throw if other than unsigned long or unsigned long[] is passed.
> It looks like the spec still has |optional| in front of the
> time/pattern arguments.  Don't we want to get rid of this?

I believe we ought to be able to get rid of the optional keywords now, so I dropped them from the spec.

> We should probably also get rid of the big comment taken from
> Mozilla's source.  It's only serving to confuse people (e.g. [1]).

Yes indeed. I removed the comment.



> [1] http://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/01/using-the-vibrator-api-part-of-webapi/comment-page-1/#comment-1316174
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 09:35:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:52 UTC