Re: [html media capture] proposed (revised) resolution of your HTML Media Capture Last Call Comments (Please respond)

On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:36:44 +0100, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

> Chaals
>
> Thanks for raising Last Call issues on HTML Media Capture - thinking  
> about them has helped us improve the specification.

It looks better, so I am glad if I helped :)

> We have an update to HTML Media Capture with the primary change being to  
> make capture a boolean attribute. In conjunction with this change  
> additional examples have been added.

Both good changes.

> You had two Last Call comments on HTML Media Capture [1] before these  
> changes:
>
> (1) LC-2641 allow hint as to which camera to use
[...]
> Do you agree that with the latest set of changes this issue is moot?

Yes.

Minor editorial point, you should style the RFC2119 keywords in section 4  
(security and privacy) to match those in other parts of the spec.

> .(2) LC-2640 clarify that the capture attribute can be in markup, not  
> only in examples
[snip]

> Does these changes adequately address this issue?

Yes, this is now very clear. Thank you.

> See the latest editors draft for details:  
> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/

Even more minor editorial point for your next publication - the editors of  
HTML5 have changed, adn you should update your reference.

> Please respond (including the list) indicating if these two Last Call  
> issues can be closed with these changes.

Indeed they can. Thanks again

cheers

Chaals

> Thanks
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair, W3C DAP Working Group
>
> [1]  
> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/doc/


-- 
Chaals - standards declaimer

Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 16:53:21 UTC