Re: Discovery API proposals: call for comments

It would not meet key requirements from HNTF which is our primary
motivation for solving the discovery problem.

On 10/12/11 2:10 PM, "Josh Soref" <jsoref@rim.com> wrote:

>Technically a stub implementation could only expose e.g. Public servers
>reachable from the same origin's backend. It would still be a valid
>implementation of the general api. Sure it wouldn't give access to local
>(physical), local (bluetooth), or local (subnet) elements, but it would
>let the user discover and select "sensors" (e.g. I might select the YYZ
>weather station instead of the LAX weather station). This could easily be
>quite valuable to me even though it might not quite match someone's
>expectation.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>information, privileged material (including material protected by the
>solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
>non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
>the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
>transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
>this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
>reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
>authorized and may be unlawful.

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 20:36:01 UTC