W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2011

RE: [vibration] Preliminary thoughts on the vibrator spec

From: Josh Soref <jsoref@rim.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:28:03 +0000
To: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>, ext Deepanshu gautam <deepanshu.gautam@huawei.com>
CC: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <957F1ECDA90E004B8DBDE23CFC94E3A31164755C@XMB103ECNC.rim.net>
Anssi wrote:
> See my initial proposal:
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0152.html

> 
> And Robin's reply:
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0158.html


I suppose I should actively +1 robin's reply.

> We haven't unearthed any use cases yet that would require explicit control
> over the on/off toggle by a web app. Please let us know if you have any.

And to underscore a point or two here:
- requests to add features lay the burden on the requester to convince the group of a need.
- silence in such an area doesn't indicate support

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 16:29:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:24 GMT