RE: [DRAFT] Media Capture Task Force Charter

We looked it over and have no objections. Ready to get started!

-Travis

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:19 AM
>To: DAP
>Subject: Fwd: [DRAFT] Media Capture Task Force Charter
>
>Any feedback on this before it becomes solid and we get started?
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>> Resent-From: public-device-apis@w3.org
>> From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
>> Date: November 16, 2011 15:42:59 GMT+01:00
>> To: "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-
>apis@w3.org>, public-webrtc@w3.org
>> Subject: [DRAFT] Media Capture Task Force Charter
>> archived-at: <http://www.w3.org/mid/22C84B78-685C-4B6F-85E4-
>A12BC073D075@berjon.com>
>>
>> Dear WebRTC and Device APIs Working Groups,
>>
>> As discussed during our joint and respective meetings, here is a draft
>proposal for a TF charter on media capture. As indicated, it is only a
>draft and is very much open to feedback, concerns, etc.
>>
>> As per process, a TF charter is a rather informal document that only
>needs to document the TF's existence. It can just live in an email that is
>linked to from our groups' pages - so we don't need to do anything
>complicated and only need to write down what we think is important to
>capture (i.e. no boilerplate required).
>>
>> """
>> The Media Capture Task Force is a joint task force of the Web Real-Time
>Communications and Device APIs WGs that aims to produce APIs to capture
>media from cameras and microphones in a manner that is both simple for
>local-only use cases and amenable to real-time streaming. This work will be
>produced by iterating over the existing "getUserMedia()" API.
>>
>> The mailing list on which the TF's discussions take is public-media-
>capture@w3.org. The chairs are Stefan Håkansson and Harald Alvestrand.
>Since any participant in either group can join the TF, decisions are made
>by consensus inside of the task force and do not require separate
>ratification by the wider groups.
>>
>> Operational modalities such as whether or not to have phone and/or face
>to face meetings, as well as where to store the draft document are left to
>the TF to decide by consensus.
>>
>> Given that this deliverable is covered by both groups' charters, the
>resulting specification will be covered by the union of RF commitments for
>both groups.
>> """
>>
>> Ideally, we should be able to garner sufficient feedback inside of a week
>to tweak this charter and just get to work, which my understanding is what
>everyone wants to do!
>>
>> --
>> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>>
>>
>
>--
>Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 17:56:22 UTC