W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2011

RE: [vibra] Vibration API

From: Deepanshu gautam <deepanshu.gautam@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:51:06 +0000
To: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>, ext Scott Graham <scottmg@google.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Message-id: <DA22857AC9F15C469BB47FE88C0201292A92BC93@SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Is it so very monumental to add simple (not multiple vibration control) Intensity functionality in V1? If not, I would suggest to have it in V1. I think there is a market need for this one.

More on: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0005.html


Regards

Deepanshu Gautam
Service Standards, Huawei Software
T: +86 25 5260008 M: +86 135 85147627

-----Original Message-----
From: Anssi Kostiainen [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:37 PM
To: ext Scott Graham
Cc: Tab Atkins Jr.; public-device-apis@w3.org WG; public-webevents@w3.org
Subject: Re: [vibra] Vibration API

Hi Scott,

On 14.11.2011, at 19.33, ext Scott Graham wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm happy to hear your use cases that may not be served with what we have. But please note that for v1 we've agreed to be rather tight in scope and defer more advanced functionality to v2.
> 
> I guess the obvious one is some measure of intensity of vibration, or (similarly?) controlling individual vibration motors separately, where each might be intended for different frequencies.

I've added your proposal to the list of things to look at in v2:

  http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/FutureWork

Feel free to amend the wiki yourself.

-Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 06:53:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:24 GMT