W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Review of the Battery Status Event specification

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:31:48 +0300
CC: <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <36283CA6-15F1-4AF7-81DE-BE4315076295@nokia.com>
To: <kihong.kwon@samsung.com>
Hi Kihong,

On 30.5.2011, at 15.28, ext DZȫ wrote:

> I'm Kihong Kwon and works for Samsung Electronics.
> Concerning to revised draft of Battery Status Spec, I have a comment
> related with dropped attribute, isCharging.
> In the perspective of handset manufacturer, I think additional attribute
> might be required to indicate whether a device is strongly charged or not
> on the isPluged state.
> Because some applications would like to do certain heavy works as a
> background jobs in only strongly charged state due to battery consumption
> issue.
> In case that device is connected to USB port, the amount of power is a
> little. So it's not appropriate time to do heavy works in background.
> What do you think?

Thank you for your feedback.

I tried to simplify the prose around isPlugged to better address your concerns, but I see we may still need to clarify it. Feel free to propose better wording.

Would your use case be addressed by monitoring the level while isPlugged is true?

Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 13:29:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:46:03 UTC