RE: Messaging API and URI schemes (ISSUE-107)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com] 
...
> I don't know if it's all that cosmetic. If we use a type we 
> have to define the way in which the other parameters are 
> passed (e.g. to, cc, subject) whereas if we reuse a URI 
> scheme presumably it knows how to carry its own information.
> 
Should the URI be required to carry all info needed? Then we only need a send_msg(URI, attachments_list) method. That would make things simple (or move the headache of creating a correctly encoded URL to the developer). Adding some callbacks will give success/error feedback. 

Best regards,
Niklas