W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [contacts] Updated draft available

From: Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:07:14 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTik0kQvQWjZ56ht3LxUnkknMtVA343Tau4JH2dtZ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:

> Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 à 12:57 +0200, Rich Tibbett a écrit :
> > I've updated the Contacts spec inline with this feedback. The relevant
> > CVS diff is
> > here:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2009/dap/contacts/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.86&r2=1.87&f=h
>
> > Please take a look and let me know if there are still any items that
> > you would like me to address further.
>
> I still think the search algorithm is superfluous, or even somewhat
> misleading, given that the search results get to be hand-picked by the
> user in any case.
>
> My vision of the "search" parameter is that it presets an internal
> search field in the contacts picker, allowing the user to select more
> quickly the results that are more likely to be relevant to her; I don't
> expect the search parameter to be any more binding than this (e.g. the
> user could decide to pick a contact that doesn't match the search
> parameter as it was initially set).
>

I agree with you. I'm still trying to work out how much of the 'Search
Filters' section should be removed and whether we need to keep the
algorithms, examples and definitions or not at all. I will make further
updates on it this week.


> Otherwise, the changes look good to me, thanks!
>
> Dom
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 16:08:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:13 GMT