W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Updates to FileAPI

From: Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:30:36 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=h_SLmSjQQa-RRWwik_2e4r3Qn4hrpNGsNey3e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Returning a Date object sounds good.

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Arun Ranganathan
<aranganathan@mozilla.com>wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > On 11/12/10 11:53 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > > OK, then we need to define rules for instantiating a Date object
> > > here
> > > (in the face of strings that may or may not be valid date format
> > > strings, or may be ambiguous, note). Is the proposal to just call
> > > new
> > > Date(str)?
> >
> > Er, nevermind. We're talking about file modification dates, not web
> > resource modification dates, so my concern is unfounded.
>
>
> Right -- to be totally clear, we're talking about
> http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#dfn-file having a readonly Date attribute
> that returns the last modified on disk data.
>
> -- A*
>
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 01:31:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:15 GMT