Re: Updates to File API

On 5/18/10 3:40 PM, Dmitry Titov wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it is late to have a name change, and we've added to
>> less-than-adequate naming on the Web (example: XMLHttpRequest).
>>      
>
> Ok, I can see how it can be late if FF already shipped it... Perhaps the
> spec could at least avoid using 'fileBlob' as names of arguments, since the
> naming currently may be interpreted as  if only file-backed blobs are
> welcome :-)
>    

I agree with making argument names less hitched to files!

-- A*

Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:39:43 UTC