Re: CfC: Calendar FPWD

I support the publication of a FPWD for calendar api. I think there are a
lot of issues to be worked out, but am hopeful this will draw more attention
to these issues.

Am 10. März 2010 08:10 schrieb Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to
> publishing the Calendar API as a FPWD. The group is aware of a number of
> outstanding issues, and the overarching issue of whether to make a
> Powerbox-based API is still standing, but at least some of us feel that
> there's value in getting feedback early and often.
>
> The draft can be read at:
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/calendar/
>
> Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect — if they were
> perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and
> reasonably feature-complete.
>
> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive
> support is preferred (even if simply with a +1).
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
>
>
>
>
>