# Device APIs and Policy Working Group Teleconference ## 09 Jun 2010 [Agenda][3] See also: [IRC log][4] ## Attendees Present Alissa_Cooper, John_Morris, James_Salsman, Robin_Berjon, Dominique_Hazael- Massieux, Wojciech_maslowski, enewland, Claes_Nilsson, Richard_Tibbett, LauraA, Suresh_Chitturi, David_Rogers, Maria_Oteo, bryan_sullivan, Daniel_Coloma Regrets Frederick_Hirsch Chair Robin_Berjon Scribe Laura ## Contents * [Topics][5] 1. [announcements][6] 2. [minutes' approval][7] 3. [policy][8] 4. [Privacy][9] 5. [APIs, SysInfo][10] 6. [Contacts][11] * [Summary of Action Items][12] * * * Date: 09 June 2010 +1.650.335... is jsalsman Scribe: Laura Scribenick: LauraA ### announcements [registration][13] ack [http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/LondonF2F2010][14] darobin: reminder to register for the July F2F in London dom: added list of hotels into the wiki page [last week's minutes][15] ### minutes' approval darobin: minutes approved ### policy darobin: proposal to public Policy Framework doc ... request publication on the 24th ... any opinions about 1st public working draft of policy framework? LauraA: sent an email with last changes right before call ... suggest people look at it [Editors draft of Policy Framework document][16] .... it will change a bit, but minor changes -- overall well defined ... I think it's okay **RESOLUTION: CfC for Framework OK** darobin: objection to start call for consensus for framework doc? **ACTION:** Robin to issue CfC for Framework [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action01][17]] Created ACTION-184 - Issue CfC for Framework [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. darobin: no objections ... XACML profile ready for 1 public WD? Suresh: any IPR analysis has been done? darobin: no idea, frederick might know Suresh: maybe someone from the staff could do this analysis? drogersuk: you can go to the OASIS website for information [XACML TC][18] darobin: frederick involved in OASIS, he might be the right person to ask **ACTION:** frederick to investigate IP status for XACML [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action02][19]] Created ACTION-185 - Investigate IP status for XACML [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2010-06-16]. [This TC operates under the RF on Limited Terms Mode of the OASIS IPR Policy][20] darobin: do we want to block on this? (it's normative) Suresh: need to check if references to XACML are normative of informative darobin: agree, that can be an issue ... pending resolution for the XACML profile doc **RESOLUTION: issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate** Would prefer to resolve it sooner than later **ACTION:** Robin to issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09 -dap-minutes.html#action03][21]] Created ACTION-186 - Issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. darobin: third doc Examples document ... it is not very normative, should we make it REC track? [XACML Profile draft][22] [DAP WG home page][23] dom: suggests making it a non-normative recommendation [Policy Examples][24] [http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Examples.html][24] **RESOLUTION: issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative** darobin: are we Ok with the CfC for the examples doc, but non-normative? **ACTION:** Robin to issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action04][25]] Created ACTION-187 - Issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. [Frederick on policy reqs reorg][26] [Proposed rework of policy requirements][27] darobin: e-mail from Frederick about policy reqs, suggesting reorganisation ... any opinions on this proposal? anyone read it? I read it. I'm confused about what a prompt is dom: suggest moving it to CVS ISSUE-28? ISSUE-28 -- Requirement for NO security prompting -- pending review [http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/28][28] jsalsman: conflicting position papers in the action item number 28, issue 28 ... 3 different position docs: 2 in agreement, 1 against [http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/28][28] darobin: not sure about the impact on this doc jsalsman: ambiguity about what it is a prompt ... saying we want to eliminate prompts may not be the right thing (both modal and non-modal, they are both promtps) darobin: the idea is to avoid prompts as far as possible bryan_sullivan: intent to minimise prompt ... policy can be defined to provide choice in the level of prompting ... goal is not to eliminate prompts entirely, that's not possible alissa: we might need to clarify what we understand under prompt, modal prompt etc. +1 alissa: having a definition might be helpful drogersuk: since we've separated the docs, we need to address that so that one can not take the APIs separately without taking into account the policy bit darobin: who wrote the piece about convinience or not of prompt? drogersuk: probably bondi darobin: need a person to assign this action to **ACTION:** Laura to propose clarification language around prompting, involving Paddy and James as needed [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action05][29]] Created ACTION-188 - Propose clarification language around prompting, involving Paddy and James as needed [on Laura Arribas - due 2010-06-16]. darobin: back to previous topic, should we give an action to frederick to put reqs doc into CVS? dom: I'll do it darobin: CfC for reqs doc? **RESOLUTION: Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs** ... no objections **ACTION:** Robin to Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action06][30]] Created ACTION-189 - Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. darobin: anything else about policy? ... nothing. ### Privacy darobin: more docs to publish ... reqs doc and rule set doc +1 on waiting for ruleset alissa: for the W3C privacy doc submitted rule set doc as position paper ... might be worth waiting after the W3C privacy workshop darobin: anyone objects to waiting? ... agreed not to publish the privacy ruleset yet Suresh: about the ruleset doc, is it API independent like policy or linked to APIs? alissa: not handled yet how APIs deal with rulesets ACTION-106? ACTION-106 -- Robin Berjon to address how licenses could be handled by the API's -- due 2010-03-23 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/106][31] alissa: there are ideas but nothing documented yet Alissa: thus far we haven't settled on how rulesets will intersect with the existing APIs **RESOLUTION: Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements** **ACTION:** Robin to Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action07][32]] Created ACTION-190 - Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. ### APIs, SysInfo Robin: split core and extended? alissa: prefer to split +1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: split operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc to a separate, extended specification a+ And SSID and Mac address are dropped, right? this is for [http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/][33] right? PROPOSED RESOLUTION: drop operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc from SysInfo, revisit an Extended spec later +1 **RESOLUTION: drop operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc from SysInfo, revisit an Extended spec later** ACTION-183? ACTION-183 -- Dzung Tran to drop connections[] and activeConnection, move to activeConnections[] and define clearly what "active" means -- due 2010-06-09 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/183][34] dom, you wanted to note codecs darobin: any objections to CfC? [http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/#audio-and-video- codecs][35] ISSUE-85 was raised for the capture API jsalsman: see some issues with this section, could be developed a bit more darobin: james, could you review SysInfo and share it in the list? jsalsman: sure **ACTION:** James to send pre-LC editorial comments on sysinfo [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action08][36]] Created ACTION-191 - Send pre-LC editorial comments on sysinfo [on James Salsman - due 2010-06-16]. PROPOSED RESOLUTION: issue a CfC of SysInfo for LC after ACTION-191 and subsequent edits, ACTION-183, and operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc have been dropped **RESOLUTION: issue a CfC of SysInfo for LC after ACTION-191 and subsequent edits, ACTION-183, and operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc have been dropped** ### Contacts [Contacts API updates][37] darobin: richard sent an e-mail, he made quite a few changes based on feedback received before +1 on heartbeat publication darobin: anyone objects to hearbeat publication for this API? ... no objections RESOLUTION: publish a heartbeat of Contacts **ACTION:** robin to request publication of Contacts [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action09][38]] Created ACTION-192 - Request publication of Contacts [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. richt, you missed the discussion! richt, anything you want to say before we move on? sorry I'm having serious issues with phone and wifi today :-( richt: sorry missed Contacts discussion darobin: dom just asked about plans to move into LC ... given current status of spec, and feedback received we could move to LC during the July F2F richt: I made some updates from the received feedback. there are a few questions that still need answering dom, you wanted to ask about LC goals richt: i'll be creating a new document before next week's call ... I would like to wait until the next version of the spec ... still need more feedback ... would like to produce a larger set of properties +1 on waiting for feedback on larger set of properties darobin: agree, if you have updates coming, it makes sense to wait (this relates to ISSUE-71 I think) darobin: objections on waiting for publication? ... no objections in the call ... other issues to be discussed in the mailing list RESOLUTION: overturn previous resolution to publish contacts, wait for next update darobin: end of the agenda ... AOB? thanks and good bye RRSAgent: make minutes ## Summary of Action Items **[NEW]** **ACTION:** frederick to investigate IP status for XACML [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action02][19]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** James to send pre-LC editorial comments on sysinfo [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action08][36]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** Laura to propose clarification language around prompting, involving Paddy and James as needed [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action05][29]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** Robin to Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action06][30]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** Robin to Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action07][32]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** Robin to issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action04][25]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** Robin to issue CfC for Framework [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action01][17]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** Robin to issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09 -dap-minutes.html#action03][21]] **[NEW]** **ACTION:** robin to request publication of Contacts [recorded in [http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action09][38]] [End of minutes] * * * Minutes formatted by David Booth's [scribe.perl][39] version 1.135 ([CVS log][40]) $Date: 2009-03-02 03:52:20 $ [1]: http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home [2]: http://www.w3.org/ [3]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device- apis/2010Jun/0069.html [4]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-irc [5]: #agenda [6]: #item01 [7]: #item02 [8]: #item03 [9]: #item04 [10]: #item05 [11]: #item06 [12]: #ActionSummary [13]: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43696/london2010/ [14]: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/LondonF2F2010 [15]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device- apis/2010Jun/0031.html [16]: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Framework.html [17]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action01 [18]: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml [19]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action02 [20]: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml/ipr.php [21]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action03 [22]: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Profile.html [23]: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/Overview.html [24]: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Examples.html [25]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action04 [26]: http://www.w3.org/mid/E37E3443-AF7B-4135-9C2D-A11FFE2A2480@nokia.com [27]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device- apis/2010Jun/att-0065/Proposal.html [28]: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/28 [29]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action05 [30]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action06 [31]: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/106 [32]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action07 [33]: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/ [34]: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/183 [35]: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/#audio-and-video-codecs [36]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action08 [37]: http://www.w3.org/mid/AANLkTikT_RBr08jWh_-CKAPs1pCqHU_hJ- KhDqbaVGln@mail.gmail.com [38]: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html#action09 [39]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [40]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/