Hi all, this is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to publishing the Access Control Requirements as a FPWD. The draft can be read at: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/ Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect — if they were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and reasonably feature-complete. Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Thanks! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 15:12:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:10 GMT