- From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:13:42 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
api, ext, device, service With tequila? Yes sir! -Anssi On 14.1.2010, at 16.02, ext John Kemp wrote: > api, ext, device, service > > Are you inviting us for tequila too (in which case, I accept) > Robin? ;) > > - johnk > > On Jan 14, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am loth to open a naming debate, so as agreed on the call >> yesterday let's make it swift. I initially planned on doing this on >> a Friday, but I won't be around tomorrow so today's the new Friday. >> >> We've resolved to use the navigator.device.<module>.<method> form >> yesterday (for APIs where it makes sense, naturally). It's been >> suggested that "device" isn't such a great name, and alternatives >> have been proposed. >> >> The following alternative (including keeping things as they are) >> have been proposed: >> >> device >> service >> api >> ext >> >> Since this is essentially a bike-shed decision, I've decided to use >> a variant of the Survivor decision process. The normal Survivor >> process is synchronous and therefore won't work well here. The >> variant is this: please vote with the list of options above ordered >> from the one you *hate most* (and therefore want to see voted off >> the island) to the one you hate least. The winner will be selected >> using a commonsensical ordering and tequila. Voting closes when I >> get to work Monday morning; since this is a vote (albeit informal) >> we don't need to know what the reasoning behind your preference is >> (though you may include it, if it's entertaining enough). >> >> My vote: api, ext, device, service. >> >> -- >> Robin Berjon >> robineko — hired gun, higher standards >> http://robineko.com/ >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 14:28:37 UTC