- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:22:48 +0200
- To: <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
- CC: <public-device-apis@w3.org>, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
As another data point, the Widgets Requirements document is non-normative yet uses capitalized MUST language for requirements. Seems to make sense to specify requirements with that language since they are "requirements", but I understand the concern. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/ I didn't find any guidance in the W3C Manual of Style or Process document. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > Claes > > I'd expect this to be an informative note. > > I think we should publish since it represents an update from what we have had previously, but publishing should not stop contributions and continued work on it. > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:50 AM, ext Nilsson, Claes1 wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I still think that there are much vagueness in the document. This especially applies to section 3 on "Trusted Widget or Application" use case. We really need more discussion on this use case. Furthermore, I am not 100% convinced that this should be a normative document. >> >> However, as said before, public publishing may be a way to get wider feedback so I can say +1, not because I feel comfortable but to (hopefully) get more flesh on the bones from people outside of DAP. >> >> Regards >> Claes >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis- >>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >>> Sent: den 25 augusti 2010 16:45 >>> To: public-device-apis@w3.org >>> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >>> Subject: CfC: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and >>> Requirements; deadline Aug 31 >>> >>> On today's call we discussed publishing an update of the "Device API >>> Access Control Use Cases and Requirements" in the spirit of publish >>> early and often. >>> >>> This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to >>> publishing an updated WD of the Device API Access Control Use Cases >>> and Requirements document (last published 29 June 2010). >>> >>> The draft can be read at: >>> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/ >>> >>> This draft is a clarification and update to the previous publication >>> reflecting our recent discussions. Publishing an update should give >>> this wider visibility and enable others to see the progression of the >>> work. >>> >>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but >>> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send >>> feedback by next Tuesday (Aug 31). >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> regards, Frederick >>> >>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >>> Co-Chair, DAP WG >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:23:54 UTC