W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

a note on time slots (Re: Calendaring coordination)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:19:59 +0200
Cc: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Message-Id: <84164EAC-7CEC-465F-AB87-17D46C1292D8@w3.org>
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Robin just pointed out that noon ET would be *extremely* inconvenient for folks from Korea (at least one of whom will be part of the conversation).

So let's decouple this:  If you're interested in the conversation, please speak up now.

Once we have a firm list of participants, we'll need to go through the scheduling exercise.

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)







On 9 Aug 2010, at 22:14, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 28 Jul 2010, at 12:21, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
>> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways.  The IETF calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to the CalConnect consortium:
>> 	http://www.calconnect.org/
>> 
>> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement.  I'll follow up on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting.
> 
> 
> There's a proposal on the table to meet at noon Boston time on a Tuesday some time soon; I'm tentatively suggesting 24 August.
> 
> My suggestion would be that the agenda be:
> 
> 1. General presentation and possibly discussion of the calendaring API work (and requirements).  That item would require Richard and Suresh on the call, who'll know the API best.
> 
> 2. Discussion of specific lunisolar requirement and design options.  That would require the folks with an interest in lunisolar calendars.
> 
> If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please contact me.
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 14:20:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:12 GMT