W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2009

RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities

From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:00:42 +0100
To: 'Dominique Hazael-Massieux' <dom@w3.org>, "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
CC: public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6DFA1B20D858A14488A66D6EEDF26AA3208923CEF6@seldmbx03.corpusers.net>
Yes, there has been discussions on this topic at the mailing list and the interpretation of what we actually agreed and when we should start to work at things was not really clear to me. However, if this is the common understanding of the WG this is fine with me and I do not want to race the work with a generic sensor API. Thanks for documenting the resolution at the web site Dom. 
So let us work on the draft "System Information & Events API" (thanks for your work Dzung) before any generic API.

Regards
  Claes   

-----Original Message-----
From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Sent: torsdag den 12 november 2009 16:26
To: Tran, Dzung D
Cc: public-device-apis
Subject: RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities

Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 07:14 -0800, Tran, Dzung D a écrit :
> I don't want to rehash our previous discussion in the WG, but at one
> time we decided that for v1.0 we would stay with simple API that the
> implementers can implement in a short period of time.  We decided to
> remove all sensors related APIs till v2.0.

That’s my recollection as well, although I haven’t found a clear WG
resolution on the topic; but based on that recollection, I have added
the “generic sensor API” in the list of future work for DAP:
http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/#future


Dom





Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 15:01:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:01 GMT