On May 14, 2009, at 5:12 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > On May 14, 2009, at 08:51 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> Le mercredi 13 mai 2009 à 21:38 +0100, David Rogers a écrit : >>> In general we are very pleased with the charter, so here are some >>> small changes from us: >>> >>> 1) Title: "Device APIs and Security Working Group Charter" >> >> I'm not sure about adding "and Security" to the name of the group: >> * it makes the name quite long and mouthful >> * it reads awkwardly: it won't work on device security, nor on >> security >> in general, but on the securing access to device APIs which that >> title >> doesn't convey >> >> I don't feel very strongly about it, so I can add it back if others >> do. > > Neither do I, just some suggestions in case they help consensus: Since the "Security Policy Framework" deliverable is a very important part of this Charter, I think it makes sense to directly acknowledge that in the group's name. I'm not as concerned about length as some so if that's an issue, I could live with just inserting Policy i.e. Device API and Policy WG, thus adding a +1 to David's proposal [1]. -Regards, Art Barstow [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2009May/ 0031.html>Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 19:20:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:13:59 GMT